Montana Audubon works at the local, state and national policy levels to protect our natural heritage.
We strongly support renewable energy development in Montana and are on the forefront of making sure it is done properly. Certain types of renewable energy projects can be developed appropriately in some locations. Renewable energy plays an important role in reducing the carbon emissions that fuels global warming, but projects must be developed responsibly.
Wind power is an important part of a clean and sustainable energy economy. However, proper siting of wind turbines and infrastructure is important to avoid damaging habitat and wildlife resources.
Montana Audubon works to ensure that wind energy producers do not locate their facilities in critical habitat for birds or other wildlife. Collisions with turbines can kill many birds outright, and wind turbines are known to negatively affect local bat populations. Construction and use of roads and building transmission lines will often displace birds and other creatures from a wide swath of habitat.
To guide us in our work, Montana Audubon has adopted a Wind Energy Siting Policy Guidance Document.
Commercial wind development harms bird populations by increasing mortality due to outright collisions with turbines, and overall fragmentation of habitat.
Bird Collisions with Wind Turbines:
Since most birds migrate at night, they are vulnerable to collisions with structures such as wind turbines. This is especially true when weather conditions force birds to fly at lower elevations.
In Montana, studies at Judith Gap Wind Farm indicate that there are fatalities between 3.3 – 4.5 birds per turbine per year. Environmental studies done prior to construction of this facility predicted this fatality rate, which is considered acceptable for a wind project because it will not impact bird populations.
The positives about newer wind turbines is that they do not have places for birds to perch or nest: these turbines lack lattice structures where birds could perch. In addition, transmission lines between turbines are nearly always buried underground. Fewer birds using turbines, power lines and poles, means a reduced potential for birds striking turbines. This is especially true on the prairie, where perches are particularly attractive to everything from meadowlarks to raptors. Since this design change, the number of birds killed by wind turbines has decreased significantly.
Bats and Wind Turbines:
There are at least two ways that bats are killed by wind turbines. First, since most bats migrate at night, they are vulnerable to colliding with structures such as wind turbine. Bats may be attracted to the moving blade of the wind turbine. This attraction can spell trouble: if bats get too close to the turbine blade, they can be sucked into the lower pressure area following the blade.
Studies at Judith Gap Wind Farm indicate that there are fatalities between 7 – 13 bats per turbine per year. Environmental studies conducted prior to construction of this wind farm predicted 4 bats per turbine per year. Consequently, the bat mortality rates were higher than expected. Newer studies about bats and turbines suggest that “barotrauma” is unlikely to cause mortality.
Habitat fragmentation occurs when wind farms—and their associated roads, power lines, and other structures—displace wildlife. The effects of habitat fragmentation go far beyond the immediate “footprint” of the wind farm, because some wildlife—particularly prairie species—will avoid areas with high towers. A solution is to keep these projects close to established roads, cropland, and other developed areas—and away from large blocks of crucial wildlife habitat.
Commercial wind facilities in Montana use between 20 acres (Two Dot) and 50,000 acres (Glacier Wind Farm near Shelby).
Wind Facility Regulation
Currently Montana has virtually no ability to regulate wind farms. Consequently, wildlife concerns may only be addressed if a project is located on public land. When this happens, an environmental review must be conducted under either the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) for state land, or under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for federal land (forest service, BLM, etc.). These environmental reviews usually allow the public to comment on the proposed project.